Re: log-buf-len dynamic

From: Randy.Dunlap
Date: Thu Sep 25 2003 - 13:43:58 EST


On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:22:33 +0200 Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| On Thu, 25 September 2003 10:30:58 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
| >
| > That's actually a pretty good point. I end up releasing "sparse" only as a
| > BK archive, simply because I'm too lazy to care and there aren't enough
| > people involved (and those that _are_ involved do actually end up
| > re-exporting it as non-BK, but that doesn't invalidate your point).
|
| Actually, sparse taught me how life was before the internet. I had to
| ask someone else to get it for me, don't want to bother him on a
| regular basis and am stuck with an old version. Not that I've done
| anything with it worth giving back, but I do feel the pain.
|
| On the other hand, if it matters enough, people will find solutions.
| Would be nice, if Larry coded up something central that all projects
| could benefit from, but that is not necessary. All projects that grow
| important enough will have a solution someday.
|
| BTW: Is there a non-bk way to get recent sparse code yet?

Snapshots are available at
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/sparse/


--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/