Re: log-buf-len dynamic

[Willy Tarreau]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:48:49AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:29:59AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > because you obviously never felt your heart accelerate and beat very loud
> > during these operations and cannot understand why some people prefer to keep
> 
> well, I kind of remeber that ;)
> 
> So ok, that sounds a good enough argument to keep the old patch too,
> despite you may be very few people using this.

Thanks for your understanding ;-)
 
> But let's do it only in 2.4, 2.6 should have it only dynamic.
> 
> clearly if you can try to go 2.6 (possibly using a wrong .config) then
> you can risk editing the lilo/grub file as well. And with 2.6, with the
> printk rewrite that shrinks and grows the buffer, you should have no
> need of the parameter any more.

I have not tried it remotely yet, but I may adapt to a new behaviour or write
a patch :-)

Cheers,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/