Re: log-buf-len dynamic

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:29:59AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> because you obviously never felt your heart accelerate and beat very loud
> during these operations and cannot understand why some people prefer to keep

well, I kind of remeber that ;)

So ok, that sounds a good enough argument to keep the old patch too,
despite you may be very few people using this.

But let's do it only in 2.4, 2.6 should have it only dynamic.

clearly if you can try to go 2.6 (possibly using a wrong .config) then
you can risk editing the lilo/grub file as well. And with 2.6, with the
printk rewrite that shrinks and grows the buffer, you should have no
need of the parameter any more.

Andrea - If you prefer relying on open source software, check these links:
	    rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/
	    http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
	    svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.[46]/trunk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/