Re: 2.7 block ramblings (was Re: DMA for ide-scsi?)

[Jens Axboe]

On Sat, Sep 20 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 16 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> >>And we should deprecate them with a solution that aligns what with Linus
> >>described in Dec 2001 on lkml:  a chrdev where userland write(2)s cdbs
> >>and taskfiles, and read(2)s the results.  This is where my thinking
> >>picked up:  if we are creating a chrdev to send "packets" and receive
> >>responses to those packets............  <insert conclusion here>
> >
> >
> >== bsg, block sg. Did you read what I wrote? :). I started implementing
> >this and have something that barely works. You just bind a block device
> >to a /dev/sg* char device and use read/write on that. Aka sg.
> 
> sg needs some modifications -- for example it errors out instead of 
> sleeps on queue full -- but sounds good to me.

Definitely. bsg will be a new implementation from scratch, also dumping
a lot of really (imo) useless "features" that clutter up the code. And
yes, of course it should honor the typical write(2) model :)

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/