Re: swsusp: revert to 2.6.0-test3 state

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > No, you have to understand that I don't want to call software_suspend() at 
> > all. You've made the choice not to accept the swsusp changes, so we're 
> > forking the code. We will have competing implementations of 
> > suspend-to-disk in the kernel. 
> 
> And the fork happened in 2.6.0-test4?
> 
> Some how I thought the 6, being even, meant stable.
> 
> I am at a complete loss how these test3 to test4 major changes
> that broke everything meet with the often repeated definitions
> of how kernel development is to be accomplished.
> 
> Perhaps I missed something, development kernels include all
> odd numbers and 6?

Patrick decided 6 is odd for him and Linus failed to stop that :-(. We
are working on fixing it up now. Hopefully in -test6 or so time it
works at least as good as it did in -test3, then there's some chance
for improvement (some of his patches actually look pretty good).
								Pavel
-- 
Horseback riding is like software...
...vgf orggre jura vgf serr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/