Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > In all actuality, I don't need swsusp. I have a better suspend-to-disk
> > implementation that is faster, smaller, and cleaner. I've hesitated
> > merging it because I thought swsusp improvements would be more welcome.
> > Obviously they're not; or you haven't actually taken the time to read the
> > code.
> 
> Is there somewhere we can download your code?  swsusp in -test3 hung my box 
> immediately without touching the disk, and in -test4 there doesn't seem to be 
> any way to trigger it under /proc or /sys...

echo -n disk > /sys/power/disk, but it is broken.

> I've been subscribed to the swsusp list for two weeks now and 2.6 has only 
> been mentioned _once_, and that was a two message thread with somebody asking 
> about it and nigel saying he didn't have time to work on it right now.  It's 
> a apparently a 2.4-only list, and I don't use 2.4 anymore.

2.6 swsusp development is not really done on that list.

									Pavel
-- 
Horseback riding is like software...
...vgf orggre jura vgf serr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/