Re: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy

[Nick Piggin]

Roger Luethi wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:53:01 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>  
>
> > I haven't run many tests on it - my mind blanked when I tried to
> > remember the scores of scheduler "exploits" thrown around. So if
> > anyone would like to suggest some, or better still, run some,
> > please do so. And be nice, this isn't my type of scheduler :P
> >    
>
> I timed a pathological benchmark from hell I've been playing with lately.
> Three consecutive runs following a fresh boot. Time is in seconds:
>
> 2.4.21			821	21	25
> 2.6.0-test3-mm1		724	946	896
> 2.6.0-test3-mm1-nick	905	987	997
>
> Runtime with ideal scheduling: < 2 seconds (we're thrashing).
>  

Cool. Can you post the benchmark source please?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/