Re: 2.6.0-test2+Util-linux/cryptoapi

From: Frank v Waveren (fvw@var.cx)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 11:37:18 EST

Next message: Martin List-Petersen: "Re: 2.4 / 2.6 802.11g 54Mbs support ?"
Previous message: Flameeyes: "2.6.0-test2, sensors and sysfs"
In reply to: James Morris: "Re: 2.6.0-test2+Util-linux/cryptoapi"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: 2.6.0-test2+Util-linux/cryptoapi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:20:48PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > Owch. But I assume this didn't sneak in since the testing cryptoAPI
> > patches? Or have the algorithms been redone?
> I'm not sure what you mean.
I'm currently using hvr's testing cryptoAPI patches for 2.4.x, and I
have a block device encrypted with 256 bits serpent. This cannot be
correctly decrypted with linux-2.6.0-test2. Has something in the use
of serpent changed since then (or has block numbering changed again)?
Or should I go bug-hunting?

-- 
Frank v Waveren                                      Fingerprint: 21A7 C7F3
fvw@[var.cx|stack.nl|chello.nl] ICQ#10074100            1FF3 47FF 545C CB53
Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/fvw@var.cx            7BD9 09C0 3AC1 6DF2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin List-Petersen: "Re: 2.4 / 2.6 802.11g 54Mbs support ?"
Previous message: Flameeyes: "2.6.0-test2, sensors and sysfs"
In reply to: James Morris: "Re: 2.6.0-test2+Util-linux/cryptoapi"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: 2.6.0-test2+Util-linux/cryptoapi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:50 EST