Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386

From: Mike Fedyk (mfedyk@matchmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 30 2003 - 13:30:33 EST

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: module-init-tools don't support gzipped modules."
Previous message: mfkq99@dial.pipex.com: "Re: NetGear WG602 Linux Source Code?"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:10:06PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:56:23PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> >...
> > Please apply. Worst to say, even Debian seems to start using i486+
> > features (ie. libstdc++5 is SIGILLed on Am386 because there's no
> > "lock" insn available)...
>
> Shouldn't the 486 emulation in the latest 386 kernel images in Debian
> unstable take care of this?

What emulation?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: module-init-tools don't support gzipped modules."
Previous message: mfkq99@dial.pipex.com: "Re: NetGear WG602 Linux Source Code?"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:46 EST