Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Date: Wed Jul 30 2003 - 13:10:06 EST

Next message: mfkq99@dial.pipex.com: "Re: NetGear WG602 Linux Source Code?"
Previous message: Ville Herva: "Re: 2.4.22pre8 hangs too (Re: 2.4.21-jam1, aic7xxx-6.2.36: solid hangs)"
In reply to: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Reply: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:56:23PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>...
> Please apply. Worst to say, even Debian seems to start using i486+
> features (ie. libstdc++5 is SIGILLed on Am386 because there's no
> "lock" insn available)...

Shouldn't the 486 emulation in the latest 386 kernel images in Debian
unstable take care of this?

> MfG, JBG
>...

cu
Adrian

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: mfkq99@dial.pipex.com: "Re: NetGear WG602 Linux Source Code?"
Previous message: Ville Herva: "Re: 2.4.22pre8 hangs too (Re: 2.4.21-jam1, aic7xxx-6.2.36: solid hangs)"
In reply to: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Reply: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: TSCs are a no-no on i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:46 EST