Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)

From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sat Jul 26 2003 - 22:28:02 EST


On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:21:37 +0200, Daniel Egger said:
> > Also reiserfs does not use compression, that would be very nice of it
> > :), because flash has limited number of erase cycles per block (in range
> > 100.000)
>
> I don't see what the compression has to do with the limited number of
> erase/write cycles.

It's a subtle point - let's say you have a 32K blob of data and a 4K block/
erase/whatever size on the flash. If you write it uncompressed, then 8 blocks
are going to get an erase cycle. If however you can compress it down to 12K
(not at all unusual for text), then only 3 blocks get an erase cycle, and the
other 5 blocks get to live longer...



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:30 EST