Hi!
> > Okay, I killed few trivial hunks, will submit them through trivial
> > patch monkey. Are you happy now, patrick?
>
> Why do you insist on abusing the trivial patch monkey? Why can't you send
> them directly to the maintainers? For instance, you add/remove printk()s
> and comments that other people may or may not want in there.
>
> But no, this doesn't make me happy because you insist on munging multiple
> patches together that have little to do with each other, besides the fact
> they touch the same file. Like I said in private email, it really helps to
> track down a problem if each patch and subsequent changeset is as small
> and localized as possible.
>
> And, that's a real problem with swsusp. It's a huge mess right now. I'd
> like to see it work well and reliably for 2.6, and have the source code be
> in a state where people can look at it without running away screaming.
> Convoluted updates are not going to help the situation.
[Sorry for the mess, I guess we are on the good way to solve this in
private mails.]
Pavel
-- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:30 EST