Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Sat Jul 26 2003 - 14:20:27 EST


On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:19, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> I've no plausible explanation for this; perhaps the only possible one
>> is that one of the algorithms that was sped up was behaving badly enough
>> to interfere with scheduling.

On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 08:31:18PM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> I've also noticed that 2.6.0-test1-wl1A behaves pretty well, given that
> no major changes to the CPU scheduler are included.

Okay, now there's a question of narrowing down which piece of it did
it. It consists of 38 or so pieces so 6 boots should do it.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:29 EST