Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> I hope you don't consider a 100 Mb/s PCI device to be
> a nasty old NIC. It's not an NE2000 you know! I have this:
Sorry, I got my boomerangs and vortices mixed up. Vortex is the ancient one.
> I added code to the top and bottom of do_IRQ, as well as to
> the top and bottom of boomerang_interrupt. The lockmeter was
> compiled into the kernel but never enabled. I record the
> minimum and maximum time in microseconds.
>
> -------------------------------
> IRQ num use min max
> --- ------ -------- --- -------
> 0 746770 timer 40 103595
> 1 936 i8042 13 389773
> 2 0 cascade - -
> 3 - - - -
> 4 9 serial 28 56
> 5 0 uhci-hcd - -
> 6 - - 711 711
> 7 - - 25 25
> 8 - - - -
> 9 - - - -
> 10 - - - -
> 11 2417 eth0 87 1535331
> 12 60 i8042 18 102895
> 13 - - - -
> 14 13844 ide0 8 51944
> 15 2 ide1 7 11
But did your instrumentation account for nested interrupts? What happens
if a slow i8042 interrupt happens in the middle of a 3c59x interrupt?
Still, that probably doesn't account for the stalls.
I don't know what does account for it, frankly. You could try dropping the
2.4 driver into the 2.5 tree just to verify that it is not a driver
problem. The driver has hardly changed at all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:27 EST