Ok, so revert everything and try this patch.
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6/drivers/ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c (revision 1013)
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c (working copy)
@@ -421,11 +421,13 @@
if (packet->no_waiter) {
/* must not have a tlabel allocated */
+ HPSB_DEBUG("TLABEL: no_waiter, returning");
free_hpsb_packet(packet);
return;
}
if (ackcode != ACK_PENDING || !packet->expect_response) {
+ HPSB_DEBUG("TLABEL: not pending or no response expected, returning");
packet->state = hpsb_complete;
up(&packet->state_change);
up(&packet->state_change);
@@ -437,6 +439,7 @@
packet->sendtime = jiffies;
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->pending_pkt_lock, flags);
+ HPSB_DEBUG("TLABEL: appending packet to pending list");
list_add_tail(&packet->list, &host->pending_packets);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->pending_pkt_lock, flags);
@@ -609,8 +612,11 @@
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->pending_pkt_lock, flags);
+ HPSB_DEBUG("TLABEL: Checking for tlabel %d", tlabel);
+
list_for_each(lh, &host->pending_packets) {
packet = list_entry(lh, struct hpsb_packet, list);
+ HPSB_DEBUG("TLABEL: tlabel %d in list", packet->tlabel);
if ((packet->tlabel == tlabel)
&& (packet->node_id == (data[1] >> 16))){
break;
@@ -618,11 +624,12 @@
}
if (lh == &host->pending_packets) {
- HPSB_DEBUG("unsolicited response packet received - np");
+ HPSB_DEBUG("unsolicited response packet received - no tlabel match");
dump_packet("contents:", data, 16);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->pending_pkt_lock, flags);
return;
- }
+ } else
+ HPSB_DEBUG("TLABEL: Found tlabel");
switch (packet->tcode) {
case TCODE_WRITEQ:
@@ -642,7 +649,7 @@
if (!tcode_match || (packet->tlabel != tlabel)
|| (packet->node_id != (data[1] >> 16))) {
- HPSB_INFO("unsolicited response packet received");
+ HPSB_INFO("unsolicited response packet received - tcode mismatch");
dump_packet("contents:", data, 16);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->pending_pkt_lock, flags);
@@ -946,6 +953,7 @@
host->driver->devctl(host, CANCEL_REQUESTS, 0);
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->pending_pkt_lock, flags);
+ HPSB_DEBUG("TLABEL: splicing pending packets for abort_requests");
list_splice(&host->pending_packets, &llist);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&host->pending_packets);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->pending_pkt_lock, flags);
@@ -969,20 +977,16 @@
LIST_HEAD(expiredlist);
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->csr.lock, flags);
- expire = (host->csr.split_timeout_hi * 8000
- + (host->csr.split_timeout_lo >> 19))
- * HZ / 8000;
- /* Avoid shortening of timeout due to rounding errors: */
- expire++;
+ expire = host->csr.expire;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->csr.lock, flags);
-
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->pending_pkt_lock, flags);
for (lh = host->pending_packets.next; lh != &host->pending_packets; lh = next) {
packet = list_entry(lh, struct hpsb_packet, list);
next = lh->next;
if (time_before(packet->sendtime + expire, jiffies)) {
+ HPSB_DEBUG("TLABEL: packet removed in abort_timedouts");
list_del(&packet->list);
list_add(&packet->list, &expiredlist);
}
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ieee1394/csr.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6/drivers/ieee1394/csr.c (revision 1013)
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/ieee1394/csr.c (working copy)
@@ -89,7 +89,36 @@
0x3f1));
}
+/*
+ * HI == seconds (bits 0:2)
+ * LO == fraction units of 1/8000 of a second, as per 1394 (bits 19:31)
+ *
+ * Convert to units and then to HZ, for comparison to jiffies.
+ *
+ * BY default this will end up being 800 units, or 100ms (125usec per
+ * unit).
+ *
+ * NOTE: The spec say 1/8000, but also says we can compute based on 1/8192
+ * like CSR specifies. Should make our math less complex.
+ */
+static inline void calculate_expire(struct csr_control *csr)
+{
+ unsigned long units;
+
+ /* Take the seconds, and convert to units */
+ units = (unsigned long)(csr->split_timeout_hi & 0x07) << 13;
+ /* Add in the fractional units */
+ units += (unsigned long)(csr->split_timeout_lo >> 19);
+
+ /* Convert to jiffies */
+ csr->expire = (unsigned long)(units * HZ) >> 13UL;
+
+ /* Just to keep from rounding low */
+ csr->expire++;
+}
+
+
static void add_host(struct hpsb_host *host)
{
host->csr.lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
@@ -100,6 +129,7 @@
host->csr.node_ids = 0;
host->csr.split_timeout_hi = 0;
host->csr.split_timeout_lo = 800 << 19;
+ calculate_expire(&host->csr);
host->csr.cycle_time = 0;
host->csr.bus_time = 0;
host->csr.bus_manager_id = 0x3f;
@@ -336,10 +366,12 @@
case CSR_SPLIT_TIMEOUT_HI:
host->csr.split_timeout_hi =
be32_to_cpu(*(data++)) & 0x00000007;
+ calculate_expire(&host->csr);
out;
case CSR_SPLIT_TIMEOUT_LO:
host->csr.split_timeout_lo =
be32_to_cpu(*(data++)) & 0xfff80000;
+ calculate_expire(&host->csr);
out;
/* address gap */
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ieee1394/csr.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6/drivers/ieee1394/csr.h (revision 1013)
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/ieee1394/csr.h (working copy)
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
quadlet_t state;
quadlet_t node_ids;
quadlet_t split_timeout_hi, split_timeout_lo;
+ unsigned long expire; // Calculated from split_timeout
quadlet_t cycle_time;
quadlet_t bus_time;
quadlet_t bus_manager_id;
-- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:26 EST