Andre Hedrick wrote:
>Don't "FEEL" cause I do not give a damn about what people "FEEL".
>Don't "SHARE", cause it is usually followed by "FEELINGS".
>
>I do have an interest in what people "think", and can use for logical
>discussion.
>
>The moment anyone goes to "because I feel" or "just because I", they can
>no longer think.
>
And this is a thought in itself, umm would like to know, is there
anything that can be expressed
consciousely/un-consciousley without being a thought first. Guess my
thought telling me that I am
guessing that I am thinking about my thoughts driven by this thread for
now :-)
>If you want to "SHARE" something, how about a "doughnut", but keep your
>feelings to yourself and express thoughts. Thoughts on how to protect and
>defend the ideas of the OSC are good. Your compasion subjected "on" me
>refusing to yield to your "feel good" crap, don't need it. Return to
>Sender.
>
>
>
Hmm share or *satisfication* of the animal ego inside a breed known as
human, who also act clumsy most
of the times.
dacodecz
====================================================================================
watching the unseen.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:51 EST