Re: Problems with IDE - Ultra-ATA devices on a SiI chipset IDE controler

From: system_lists@nullzone.org
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 18:20:20 EST

Next message: Bill Rugolsky Jr.: "Re: kernel bug in socketpair()"
Previous message: bill davidsen: "Re: [bernie@develer.com: Kernel 2.6 size increase]"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Problems with IDE - Ultra-ATA devices on a SiI chipset IDE controler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello Alan,

I am just using 2.4.21 kernel version (standard drivers of this kernel).

Let me know if could be useful to send more information or if you need that
I do some tests (let me know what you need and i will do).

Thanks.

At 23:49 23/07/2003 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>What drives and kernel revision are you using. I have fixed some SI680
>problems fairly recently but I'd have expected different failure
>patterns (the old code would put some UDMA100 devices into UDMA133 which
>got interesting).
>
>Yes folks you *can* overclock IDE disks but its not a good idea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bill Rugolsky Jr.: "Re: kernel bug in socketpair()"
Previous message: bill davidsen: "Re: [bernie@develer.com: Kernel 2.6 size increase]"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Problems with IDE - Ultra-ATA devices on a SiI chipset IDE controler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:51 EST