On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 16:39, Larry McVoy wrote:
> That's probably a good enough test case. Explain to me how your support
> contracts are ever going to provide enough money to redo GCC or build
> something equally substantial.
> I'm not saying that you can't make a living doing support, you obviously
> can. I'm saying that it doesn't produce enough income to do what needs
> to be done.
Now we actually isolate a point on which perhaps we disagree.
If there are things which _need_ to be done, but which no individual
customer is willing to pay for in Free Software, one of the following
things will happen:
1. They'll revert to proprietary software.
2. They'll club together with other users of the software and fund it.
3. The contractors (us) will 'tax' them enough on the stuff they _are_
willing to pay for to do it in the background.
I see plenty of evidence that #2 and #3 are actually happening in real
life. I've also seen a lot of #1 of course, but I suspect its frequency
will be decreasing over the coming years.
I certainly wouldn't assert that #1 will die out altogether, but neither
will the non-existence of #2 and #3 cause the Free Software bubble to
burst.
> If it did then CVS would be BK, for example.
That's possibly a better example than your previous one of GCC, but
without disrespect to your achievements I still suspect it would have
happened, and indeed will happen, eventually.
-- dwmw2- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:41 EST