Re: [patch] ixj.c: EXPORT_SYMBOL of static functions

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun Jun 22 2003 - 06:23:07 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.5 patch] remove an unused function from wd7000.c"
Previous message: joe briggs: "Fwd: Re: [OT] Re: Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM]"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[patch] ixj.c: EXPORT_SYMBOL of static functions"
Next in thread: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: [patch] ixj.c: EXPORT_SYMBOL of static functions"
Reply: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: [patch] ixj.c: EXPORT_SYMBOL of static functions"
Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: [patch] ixj.c: EXPORT_SYMBOL of static functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sul, 2003-06-22 at 02:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> drivers/telephony/ixj.c EXPORT_SYMBOL's two static functions.
>
> Does this make any sense or is the patch below OK?

It's meant to export them. An exported static function is visible to
other modules.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.5 patch] remove an unused function from wd7000.c"
Previous message: joe briggs: "Fwd: Re: [OT] Re: Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM]"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[patch] ixj.c: EXPORT_SYMBOL of static functions"
Next in thread: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: [patch] ixj.c: EXPORT_SYMBOL of static functions"
Reply: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: [patch] ixj.c: EXPORT_SYMBOL of static functions"
Reply: Rusty Russell: "Re: [patch] ixj.c: EXPORT_SYMBOL of static functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:37 EST