Re: Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)

From: Alex Goddard (agoddard@purdue.edu)
Date: Fri Jun 06 2003 - 19:59:49 EST

Next message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
Previous message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)"
Next in thread: Ben Pfaff: "Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Greg KH wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:21:41AM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps it would be good to have an explanation for the relative
> > importance of placing braces and else on the same line as compared to
> > other formatting standards.
>
> Please read Documentation/CodingStyle.
>
> If you want more justification, read my OLS 2001 paper.

I think you mean 2002. Good reading.

-- 
Alex Goddard
agoddard@purdue.edu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
Previous message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)"
Next in thread: Ben Pfaff: "Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:32 EST