Re: Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)

• Next message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
• Previous message: David Schwartz: "RE: select for UNIX sockets?"
• In reply to: Timothy Miller: "Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)"
• Next in thread: Alex Goddard: "Re: Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)"
• Reply: Alex Goddard: "Re: Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:21:41AM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote:
>
> Perhaps it would be good to have an explanation for the relative
> importance of placing braces and else on the same line as compared to
> other formatting standards.

Please read Documentation/CodingStyle.

If you want more justification, read my OLS 2001 paper.

Hope this helps,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
• Previous message: David Schwartz: "RE: select for UNIX sockets?"
• In reply to: Timothy Miller: "Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)"
• Next in thread: Alex Goddard: "Re: Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)"
• Reply: Alex Goddard: "Re: Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:31 EST