APM vs. ACPI status detection

• Next message: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: cpu-2.5.64-1"
• Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Dcache hash distrubition patches"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

I have a little patch witch sets apm_info.disabled flag not only if APM
disabled by user but if it disabled by SMP or ACPI. Please apply.

<-- Cut here -->
--- ./arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.orig Tue Mar 11 08:59:24 2003
+++ ./arch/i386/kernel/apm.c Tue Mar 11 09:00:30 2003
@@ -1906,10 +1906,12 @@
         }
         if ((smp_num_cpus > 1) && !power_off) {
                 printk(KERN_NOTICE "apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe.\n");
+ apm_info.disabled = 1;
                 return -ENODEV;
         }
         if (PM_IS_ACTIVE()) {
                 printk(KERN_NOTICE "apm: overridden by ACPI.\n");
+ apm_info.disabled = 1;
                 return -ENODEV;
         }
         pm_active = 1;
<-- Cut here -->

Regards,

-- 
Soós Péter		Pannonhalmi Főapátság / Archabbey of Pannonhalma
			H-9090 Pannonhalma, Vár 1.
			Tel: +3696570189, Fax: +3696470011
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: cpu-2.5.64-1"
• Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Dcache hash distrubition patches"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:24 EST