Re: Dcache hash distrubition patches

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Date: Tue Mar 11 2003 - 02:47:12 EST


On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:41:07PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> It's not perfect, but not bad either. Some mathematician can go calculate
> just how imperfect it is over random distribution, but it looks OK to me ;-)

Okay, the standards are a bit more stringent for hash functions. You
basically want the total number of collisions to be minimized.

That said, standard statistical things are useful for first-pass
discrimination.

This looks basically okay, but if it's really just even with respect
to cache pressure the need for a different data structure in the
eventual future is clear. I'd need a baseline (pre-hlist) dcache
snapshot to compare against to get a better idea.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:24 EST