Re: Accessing the same disk via multiple channels

From: steve cameron (
Date: Thu Feb 13 2003 - 22:20:12 EST

Lars Marowsky-Bree ( wrote:

> SuSE (Jens Axboe and myself) have also done work on the md multipathing,
> supporting failover and load balancing and in general giving the code a rinse;
> as well as extensions to mdadm to make them work.
Yay! We noticed that if a controller fails in such a way that
no interrupts are generated then md driver doesn't notice anything is
wrong. Commands don't fail, but don't complete either. I played around with
feature in the low level driver to periodically send a no-op command
down to the controller and fail all outstanding commands and disable
the controller if that command didn't come back pretty quickly, that
seemed to work pretty well in a failover type situation.
(Better than putting a timeout on every command.) Also, md multipath
doesn't notice if the backup path has failed, to warn the user that
redundancy is no longer in effect. (Though if you set up things so i/o
is going down both paths, not such a big deal, as md will notice.
Probably you know all this already.

> The patches currently live at
> (And are included in SuSE's kernel release, of course ;-)
> Currently, for 2.5 / 2.6, I think I really like the SCSI midlayer stuff. In
> the past, I didn't, because it constrains everything to SCSI. But then,
> everything so far _has_ been SCSI, except for weird arch stuff like s390(x)
> DASDs ;-)

Well, the cciss driver is not a SCSI driver (except for purpsoes of
tape drives & tape changers) and HP/Compaq has sold more than one
million of those controllers (does popularity mean they aren't
"weird"? :-), and we have mulitpath capable storage boxes they
can connect to.

-- steve

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:55 EST