Re: another subtle signals issue

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Wed Feb 12 2003 - 16:42:58 EST


On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> This should be fine (almost). POSIX leaves it unspecified whether a
> blocked, ignored signal is left pending or not. The only thing it requires
> is that setting a blocked signal to SIG_IGN clears any pending signal, and
> sigaction already does that.

Hmm.. We could move the blocking test down, and only consider that for the
"SIG_DFL" case.

The function I did matches what the old signal code did, but the more
signals we can truly ignore, the better. I dunno.

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:44 EST