Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 02:48:37PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:41:26PM -0600, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
>>
>>>Generally, we've been trying to not make perl a prequisite for the kernel
>>>build, and I'd like to keep it that way. Except for some arch specific
>>
>>That's pretty much out the window when klibc gets merged, so perl will
>>indeed be a build requirement for all platforms...
>
>
> None of the perl scripts looks complicated.
> Obivious question is if the same functionality could be achived by a simple
> c program.
> In the tool chain we use small C utilities in favour of for example
> perl scripts in several places.
I've seen a lot of machines, and I've yet to see one that has the gcc toolchain
but not perl. Why do you want to keep perl out?
Ben
-- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:26 EST