On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:57:55AM +0300, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
>>Alexey, this piece of code was buggy first time it was coded, and it
>>may still have some holes. :-)))
>
>To my shame, I cannot say "no". It was written sort of too fast. :-)
>
>Did the reporters see packets with wrong checksum on wire or wrong tcp
>headers or something like that?
My knowledge of TCP/IP is extremely minimal but the sequence number looked
weird when the stall occurred. It looked like the sequence numbers you get
with the -S option to tcpdump. All of the other packets had small sequence
numbers and what I assume was the bad packet had a large one.
I'm sorry if this is gibberish and makes no sense. I don't know how to tell
if the checksum was wrong or not.
cgf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:18 EST