Fu, Michael wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 00:07, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 05:57:55PM +0300, Andrey Nekrasov wrote:
>
>>>or "e100" driver and with patch:
>>>
>>>
>>>--- drivers/net/e100/e100.h- Wed Dec 4 15:16:08 2002
>>>+++ drivers/net/e100/e100.h Wed Dec 4 15:16:20 2002
>>>@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
>>>
>>> #define E100_MAX_NIC 16
>>>
>>>-#define E100_MAX_SCB_WAIT 100 /* Max udelays in wait_scb */
>>>+#define E100_MAX_SCB_WAIT 5000 /* Max udelays in wait_scb */
>>> #define E100_MAX_CU_IDLE_WAIT 50 /* Max udelays in wait_cus_idle
> Which release your patch applies for ? I failed to compile it on 2.5.52. It
> seems that function e100_disable_clear_intr is not defined.
This wasn't my patch :) But anyway, 2.4.x series is actually ahead of
2.5.x in terms of e100 bugfixes, owing to Linus's vacation. If you use
BitKeeper, you can obtain the latest by issuing
bk pull http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.4
or wait another day or so for Marcelo to release 2.4.21-pre4 :)
The 2.5 and 2.4 versions of e100 are kept in sync, so it is trivial to
take 2.4's e100 and use it in 2.5 [and vice versa].
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:00:18 EST