Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)

From: Sam Ravnborg (sam@ravnborg.org)
Date: Mon Nov 04 2002 - 01:21:19 EST

Next message: Stephen Rothwell: "[PATCH] Don't invade generic code unneccessarily"
Previous message: Naohiko Shimizu: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] Transparent SuperPage Support for 2.5.44"
In reply to: Stefan Traby: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Next in thread: Dr. David Alan Gilbert: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 05:57:52AM +0100, Stefan Traby wrote:
> It's definitely not. The current solution is simply a denial of service
> attack, at moment Qt is _required_ for a build, not an optional frontend:
That error is fixed in Linus's tree already.

Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephen Rothwell: "[PATCH] Don't invade generic code unneccessarily"
Previous message: Naohiko Shimizu: "Re: [PATCH,RFC] Transparent SuperPage Support for 2.5.44"
In reply to: Stefan Traby: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Next in thread: Dr. David Alan Gilbert: "Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST