Re: [PATCH] 2/2 2.5.45 cleanup & add original copy_ro/from_user

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Sun Nov 03 2002 - 16:24:21 EST

Next message: Jussi Laako: "Re: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly"
Previous message: Russell King: "Re: 2.5: troubles with piping make output"
In reply to: Akira Tsukamoto: "Re: [PATCH] 2/2 2.5.45 cleanup & add original copy_ro/from_user"
Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH] 2/2 2.5.45 cleanup & add original copy_ro/from_user"
Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH] 2/2 2.5.45 cleanup & add original copy_ro/from_user"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 09:57:49PM -0500, Akira Tsukamoto wrote:

> Personally I don't mind adding everything in .h or .c.
> I just used the convention what string.h and string-486.h doing.
> Isn't it confusing that adding everything in .c also?

As a sidenote, string-486.h has been disabled for years
(Right back to at least 2.0.39 which is the earliest tree I have
to hand right now). It should either be fixed, or considered
worth dropping imo.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jussi Laako: "Re: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly"
Previous message: Russell King: "Re: 2.5: troubles with piping make output"
In reply to: Akira Tsukamoto: "Re: [PATCH] 2/2 2.5.45 cleanup & add original copy_ro/from_user"
Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH] 2/2 2.5.45 cleanup & add original copy_ro/from_user"
Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH] 2/2 2.5.45 cleanup & add original copy_ro/from_user"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:30 EST