On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 02:32:32 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> mentioned:
> I'd prefer that we have these functions in .c, and laid out with
> a minimum of C tricks. Because more work needs to be done on the
> memory copy functions, and doing that in header files is a pain.
Personally I don't mind adding everything in .h or .c.
I just used the convention what string.h and string-486.h doing.
Isn't it confusing that adding everything in .c also?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:27 EST