Hi!
Here's patch to prevent random scribling over disks during
suspend... In the meantime alan killed (unreferenced at that time)
idedisk_suspend() and idedisk_release(), so I have to reintroduce
them.
Now... There is *another* do_idedisk_suspend / do_idedisk_resume
method in ide_disk.c. As far as I can see, it is not used anywhere,
and is certainly not enough to prevent corruption on swsusp. [Besides,
doing suspend/resume support generically using devicefs, not with ide
stuff seems more right.] Should I go ahead and kill do_idedisk_suspend
and related code?
Pavel
--- clean/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2002-11-01 00:37:14.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-swsusp/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2002-11-01 21:36:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -1561,6 +1561,56 @@
#endif
}
+static int idedisk_suspend(struct device *dev, u32 state, u32 level)
+{
+ ide_drive_t *drive = dev->driver_data;
+
+ printk("Suspending device %p\n", dev->driver_data);
+
+ /* I hope that every freeze operation from the upper levels have
+ * already been done...
+ */
+
+ if (level != SUSPEND_SAVE_STATE)
+ return 0;
+ BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
+
+ printk("Waiting for commands to finish\n");
+
+ /* wait until all commands are finished */
+ /* FIXME: waiting for spinlocks should be done instead. */
+ if (!(HWGROUP(drive)))
+ printk("No hwgroup?\n");
+ while (HWGROUP(drive)->handler)
+ yield();
+
+ /* set the drive to standby */
+ printk(KERN_INFO "suspending: %s ", drive->name);
+ if (drive->driver) {
+ if (drive->driver->standby)
+ drive->driver->standby(drive);
+ }
+ drive->blocked = 1;
+
+ while (HWGROUP(drive)->handler)
+ yield();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int idedisk_resume(struct device *dev, u32 level)
+{
+ ide_drive_t *drive = dev->driver_data;
+
+ if (level != RESUME_RESTORE_STATE)
+ return 0;
+ if (!drive->blocked)
+ panic("ide: Resume but not suspended?\n");
+
+ drive->blocked = 0;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void idedisk_setup (ide_drive_t *drive)
{
struct hd_driveid *id = drive->id;
@@ -1709,6 +1759,10 @@
.proc = idedisk_proc,
.attach = idedisk_attach,
.drives = LIST_HEAD_INIT(idedisk_driver.drives),
+ .gen_driver = {
+ .suspend = idedisk_suspend,
+ .resume = idedisk_resume,
+ }
};
static int idedisk_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
@@ -1835,8 +1889,7 @@
static int idedisk_init (void)
{
- ide_register_driver(&idedisk_driver);
- return 0;
+ return ide_register_driver(&idedisk_driver);
}
module_init(idedisk_init);
--- clean/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c 2002-11-01 00:37:14.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-swsusp/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c 2002-11-01 01:26:37.000000000 +0100
@@ -1054,6 +1054,7 @@
"%s","IDE Drive");
drive->gendev.parent = &hwif->gendev;
drive->gendev.bus = &ide_bus_type;
+ drive->gendev.driver_data = drive;
sprintf (name, "host%d/bus%d/target%d/lun%d",
(hwif->channel && hwif->mate) ?
hwif->mate->index : hwif->index,
-- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:26 EST