> From: Jos Hulzink [mailto:josh@stack.nl]
> After some more puzzling, it becomes clear that much more
> ACPI code should rely on CONFIG_PM. (Sleep.c should not be
> compiled in at all without CONFIG_PM) As the ACPI guys seem
> awake, I assume this will be fixed soon. For now: don't
> forget to enable CONFIG_PM (Power Management in the root of
> ACPI / APM configuration)
ACPI implements PM but that's not all it implements. Is making CONFIG_PM
true if ACPI or APM are on a viable option? I think that would more
accurately reflect reality.
Or can we get rid of CONFIG_PM?
Regards -- Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 07 2002 - 22:00:21 EST