Re: What's left over.

• Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: What's left over."
• Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll)"
• In reply to: Joe Thornber: "Re: What's left over."
• Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: What's left over."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <20021031101558.GB7487@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk> you write:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:00:31PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > They have, IIRC. Interestingly, it was less invasive (existing source
> > touched) than the LVM2/DM patch you merged.
>
> FUD. I added to three areas of existing code:

[ 40-line detailed explanation snipped ]

Woah! War's over dude! We won!

I used Rusty's Unreliable Intrusiveness-o-meter (number of existing
non-config files touched), as I said.

I didn't read code or anything so unscientific or accurate. But both
DM and EVMS were way down on the "intrusiveness" list.

Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: What's left over."
• Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: Unifying epoll,aio,futexes etc. (What I really want from epoll)"
• In reply to: Joe Thornber: "Re: What's left over."
• Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: What's left over."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:57 EST