Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 19:03:39 EST

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: NUMA scheduler (was: 2.5 merge candidate list 1.5)"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
In reply to: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:44:34PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> :( I was hoping sys_epoll would be scalable without increasing the
> number of system calls per event.

I see only one call per event? sys_epoll_wait. Perhaps sys_epoll_ctl to
register a new interest.

Regards,

bert

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: NUMA scheduler (was: 2.5 merge candidate list 1.5)"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: and nicer too - Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
In reply to: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:40 EST