On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, James Cleverdon wrote:
> We have some customers with some fairly beefy servers. They can get the
> system into an unusable state that has been reported on lkml before.
> The two attached patches applied to 2.4.19 fix the problem on our test boxes.
>
> Are these patches still considered a good idea for 2.4? Is there something
> better I should be using?
Yes, these patches are a good idea. I'm curious why they
haven't been submitted to Marcelo yet ;)
Rik
-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:28 EST