Not that IDE disks would be more reliable, just that you couldn't see the
disk errors until it was too late. :-)
However, given the IDE disk prices, you can afford to replace them more
often.
Also, with SCSI drives, some people see sense errors, and correctable media
defects, and mistakenly assume it is a 'disk failure'.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Illtud Daniel [mailto:illtud.daniel@llgc.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:25 AM
[snip]
Oh, and having spent much of last night and this morning dealing
with multiple SCSI disk failures, and having seen about 5% of
ours fail in a year, I'm rapidly seeing the light on IDE.
-- Illtud Daniel illtud.daniel@llgc.org.uk Uwch Ddadansoddwr Systemau Senior Systems Analyst Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru National Library of Wales Yn siarad drosof fy hun, nid LlGC - Speaking personally, not for NLW - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:46 EST