Re: [PATCH] (re-xmit): kprobes for i386

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Tue Aug 20 2002 - 05:25:53 EST

Next message: Feldman, Scott: "RE: mdelay causes BUG, please use udelay"
Previous message: Troy Wilson: "mdelay causes BUG, please use udelay"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] (re-xmit): kprobes for i386"
Next in thread: Luca Barbieri: "Re: [PATCH] (re-xmit): kprobes for i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <20020820091915.A16965@infradead.org> you write:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 02:39:57PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > + bool ' Probes' CONFIG_KPROBES
>
> A little more descriptive options sounds like a good idea.. ;)

I couldn't really think of a better one. Kernel Probes is kinda
redundant. It's under kernel hacking, and it has a help option.

Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Feldman, Scott: "RE: mdelay causes BUG, please use udelay"
Previous message: Troy Wilson: "mdelay causes BUG, please use udelay"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] (re-xmit): kprobes for i386"
Next in thread: Luca Barbieri: "Re: [PATCH] (re-xmit): kprobes for i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 22:00:21 EST