Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> ...
> I think Andrew also mentioned he sees a lot of buffers sitting around
> in the morning. His strip-buffers-immediately hack would kill that
> one dead.
Nope. It was all inodes and dentries.
`buffermem' accounting went away in 2.5 altogether. And the
zillions-of-buffer_heads problems should be greatly improved
because a) they're half the size of 2.4's bhs and b) we
no longer attach buffer_heads for reads.
-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:37 EST