Re: Generic modules documentation is outdated

From: Yann Dirson (ydirson@altern.org)
Date: Thu Jul 18 2002 - 18:25:35 EST


On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 11:48:41PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 22:02, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > - I have installed no proprietary driver, all loaded drivers declare to be
> > "GPL" or "Dual BSD/GPL".
>
> Something you loaded was missing a MODULE_LICENSE tag - modern insmod
> will warn on this one

I wrote:
> I found a good candidate in the Apple HFS module

Hm, no, I found the real one (although HFS has the problem):

# modprobe ppp_deflate
Warning: loading /lib/modules/2.4.18+preempt/kernel/drivers/net/ppp_deflate.o will taint the kernel: non-GPL license - BSD without advertisement clause

I'm pretty sure the "BSD without advertisement clause" license should not
taint the kernel, should it ?

And even if there is an obscure license incompatibility, there is a problem
in that this module is in the stock kernels, and should then be advertised
as such (or maybe removed).

Regards,

-- 
Yann Dirson    <ydirson@altern.org> |    Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:    <yann.dirson@fr.alcove.com> |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
     http://ydirson.free.fr/        | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:28 EST