Re: Linux 2.4 as a router, when is it appropriate?

From: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer (mathieu@newview.com)
Date: Sun May 05 2002 - 21:34:19 EST

Next message: Dan Kegel: "Re: khttpd rotten?"
Previous message: chen, xiangping: "Kernel deadlock using nbd over acenic driver."
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Linux 2.4 as a router, when is it appropriate?"
Next in thread: Hirling Endre: "Re: Linux 2.4 as a router, when is it appropriate?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 07:18:05PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer <mathieu@newview.com>
> Date: 05 May 2002 22:27:52 -0400
>
> And what kind of traffic are you speaking of (I mean how much megs/teras
> per day)?
>
> We're talking about several hundred kilo packet per second routing
> over gigabit.

Impressive (thanks for this quick reply).

-- 
Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer              E-Mail : mathieu@newview.com
    It is exactly because a man cannot do a thing that he is a
                      proper judge of it.
                      -- Oscar Wilde
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dan Kegel: "Re: khttpd rotten?"
Previous message: chen, xiangping: "Kernel deadlock using nbd over acenic driver."
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Linux 2.4 as a router, when is it appropriate?"
Next in thread: Hirling Endre: "Re: Linux 2.4 as a router, when is it appropriate?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:25 EST