Re: init_idle reaped before final call

From: Kip Walker (kwalker@broadcom.com)
Date: Tue Mar 05 2002 - 17:15:53 EST


"Martin J. Bligh" wrote:
>
> > I'm working with a (approximately) 2.4.17 kernel from the mips-linux
> > tree (oss.sgi.com).
> >
> > I'd like to propose removing the "__init" designation from init_idle in
> > kernel/sched.c, since this is called from rest_init via cpu_idle.
> > Notice that rest_init isn't in an init section, and explicitly mentions
> > that it's avoiding a race with free_initmem. In my kernel (an SMP
> > kernel running on a system with only 1 available CPU), cpu_idle isn't
> > getting called until after free_initmem().
> >
> > My CPU is MIPS, but it looks like x86 could experience the same problem.
>
> I fixed something in this area for x86, looks like the same code path
> for MIPS unless I'm misreading.
>
> smp_init spins waiting on wait_init_idle until every cpu has done
> init_idle. rest_init() isn't called until smp_init returns, so I'm not sure
> how you could hit this (possibly there's a minute window after init_idle
> clears the bit, but before it returns?).

This synchronization doesn't help: cpu0 (even in the multi-cpu case)
calls init_idle twice -- once from smp_init (through smp_boot_cpus), and
then again from cpu_idle. In my failing case (CONFIG_SMP=y, but only 1
cpu in the system) the second call, the one from cpu_idle, doesn't
happen until long after the init kernel thread has been running and has
freed the initmem.

Maybe a better fix is to avoid this double calling of init_idle for the
"master" CPU? From my reading the code, x86 seems to behave the same.

Kip

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:48 EST