On Sat, 2002-03-02 at 15:47, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 09:57:49PM -0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>
> > If rmap is really better than current VM, it will be merged into head
> > development branch (2.5). There is no anti-rmap conspiracy :-)
>
> Indeed.
Of note: I don't think anyone "loses" if one VM is merged or not. A
reverse mapping VM is a significant redesign of our current VM approach
and if it proves better, yes, I suspect (and hope) it will be merged
into 2.5.
But that doesn't mean the 2.4 VM is worse, per se.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:24 EST