Re: Disgusted with kbuild developers

From: Giacomo Catenazzi (cate@debian.org)
Date: Tue Feb 19 2002 - 02:55:31 EST


Matthias Andree wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
>
>>Make the whole thing ___***IDENTICAL***___ to CML1.
>>Do a formal translation of CML1 into CML2.
>>
>
> This requirement is contrary to CML2's objective. CML2 is not about
> re-implementing CML1 tools and bugs in another language, there are at
> least two current projects for that, one of them is mconfig.

But making the translation in 3 steps make think easier:
- Change the engine (CML2), the rules are rewritten, but
   functionally nearly identical to old rules
   (Big patch)
- Change the rules (with a lot of small patches)
- Change the interface (not really need)

        giacomo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:18 EST