Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Thu Feb 07 2002 - 16:23:00 EST

Next message: Paul P Komkoff Jr: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Performance of Ingo's O(1) scheduler on NUMA-Q"
In reply to: Tom Lord: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
Next in thread: Tom Lord: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
Reply: Tom Lord: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On February 8, 2002 12:06 am, Tom Lord wrote:
> The name has curly braces so that it sorts reasonably (i.e. away from
> ordinary source files). It is not a dot file so that you can
> recognize at a glance when you are looking at the root of a project
> tree.

I'd pass on that to get rid of the extra 'noise'. If for some reason I'm not
sure - and I consider that unlikely to ever occur - I can always ls .* or
find -name ".*arch*" if I'm really confused.

I like my directories to look clean, *especially* the source root.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Paul P Komkoff Jr: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Performance of Ingo's O(1) scheduler on NUMA-Q"
In reply to: Tom Lord: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
Next in thread: Tom Lord: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
Reply: Tom Lord: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:01:07 EST