Re: Problems with O(1) scheduler on non-x86 arch's

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2002 - 21:23:59 EST

Next message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Linux 2.5.3-pre1-aia1"
Previous message: Klaus Meyer: "Re: highmem=system killer, 2.2.17=performance killer ?"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Problems with O(1) scheduler on non-x86 arch's"
Next in thread: James Bottomley: "Re: Problems with O(1) scheduler on non-x86 arch's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:50:58 +0100 (CET)
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> in the long term i think the correct approach would be to always store the
> logical CPU number in p->cpu.

The hotplug CPU patch gets rid of the whole concept of "logical CPU number".
This is even cleaner, and avoids these mistakes which bite us all the time.

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/patches/Hotcpu

Rusty.

-- 
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Linux 2.5.3-pre1-aia1"
Previous message: Klaus Meyer: "Re: highmem=system killer, 2.2.17=performance killer ?"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Problems with O(1) scheduler on non-x86 arch's"
Next in thread: James Bottomley: "Re: Problems with O(1) scheduler on non-x86 arch's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:24 EST