Let us not forget about 'deconstructionism':
deconstructionism -- (a philosophical theory of criticism ...
that seeks to expose deep-seated contradictions in a work
by delving below its surface meaning)
It doesn't even matter what Rik thinks he wrote. The real meaning is
what *we*, the readers, can devolve from his writings.
8-)
- Brian Litzinger <brian@worldcontrol.com>
> On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 08:15, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Which part of "to interprete" do you not understand ?
> >
> > Interpreting my text is reading it and building a
> > meaning for the words in your head. It doesn't mean
> > the text needs to be changed ... the meaning can be
> > different for each person reading the exact same
> > words.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 04:41:02PM -0500, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> To an extant anyone is responsible for how another takes (interprets)
> what they say. Culture is that combined collection of knowledge of the
> human race. It is your responsibility as a human to be as clear as
> possible (within reason).
>
> Were you that clear? It seems not, but I don't know. Just don't say
> you have no responsibility for how others take what you say, because
> that is just dog crap. No communication or collaboration would ever
> take place if we all had that attitude. (It most likely couldn't take
> place, let alone wouldn't.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:23 EST