Re: Differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x initrd

From: Ben Collins (bcollins@debian.org)
Date: Tue Nov 13 2001 - 20:48:09 EST

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: File server FS?"
Previous message: Matthew Dharm: "Re: PATCH: scsi_scan.c: emulate windows behavior"
In reply to: Ben Collins: "Differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x initrd"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Silly TILO. Seems 2.4.x is correctly doing things. TILO was setting HdrS
in the kernel to 0x0200 (floppy of course). So, 2.2.x was ignoring it
(the wrong behavior), and 2.4.x respects it. I changed TILO to use
0x0100, and now it boots just fine.

Sorry for the hubub.

-- 
 .----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=-----.
/                   Ben Collins    --    Debian GNU/Linux                  \
`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: File server FS?"
Previous message: Matthew Dharm: "Re: PATCH: scsi_scan.c: emulate windows behavior"
In reply to: Ben Collins: "Differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x initrd"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:37 EST