Re: fdutils.

From: Maciej W. Rozycki (macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl)
Date: Tue Nov 13 2001 - 14:42:25 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x initrd"
Previous message: Ben Collins: "Differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x initrd"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: fdutils."
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: fdutils."
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: fdutils."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 13 Nov 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Thankfully, the LS-120/LS-240 hardware is actually sane.

Do you mean there is a SCSI version available or merely the ATAPI
implementation is within the spec?

> Unfortunately the zip drive probably kept it from displacing legacy
> floppies, at least in the short term.

Unfortunately at the time I was interested in a removeable storage
replacement technology, there was only SCSI Zip available -- no SCSI
LS-120 drives. I might have not been the only one, so they got what they
asked for.

-- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x initrd"
Previous message: Ben Collins: "Differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x initrd"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: fdutils."
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: fdutils."
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: fdutils."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:36 EST