Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]

• Next message: Stuart Young: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
• Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [Ext2-devel] disk throughput"
• In reply to: Stuart Young: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
• Next in thread: Stuart Young: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Stuart Young wrote:

> Any reason we can't move all the process info into something like
> /proc/pid/* instead of in the root /proc tree?

Thanks, but no thanks. If we are starting to move stuff around, we
would be much better off leaving in /proc only what it was supposed
to contain - per-process information.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Stuart Young: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
• Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [Ext2-devel] disk throughput"
• In reply to: Stuart Young: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
• Next in thread: Stuart Young: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:25 EST